The Committee on the Marine Transportation System, in cooperation with the Transportation Research Board, hosted a conference on research and development for the Marine Transportation System June 29 through July 1, 2010. The conference was held at the Beckman Center of the National Academies in Irvine California and was a big success. Many of the issues discussed are pertinent to Harbor Safety Committees and members of the maritime community.
You can view the conference agenda as well as all the presentations given at the following website: Research and Development Conference
To view the presentation, simply click on the topic in the agenda (underlined) and the appropriate file will open. The presentations are excellent and well worth your time to peruse. While you're exploring the agenda from the R&D Conference, now is the time to start thinking of ideas for next year's HSC/AMSC conference. If you have any ideas, please feel free to post them to this blog as comments to this blog.
Friday, August 13, 2010
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
DOWNTOWN HOUSTON SELECTED AS PRIMARY CANDIDATE FOR 2011 HARBOR SAFETY MARITIME SECURITY CONFERENCE
by
Anonymous
On Tuesday August 3rd the Harbor Safety / Maritime Security (HSMS) Conference planning committee agreed to select historic Downtown Houston as the primary site for the 2011 conference. The date ranges are still being finalized but early May and early June are contenders. The next step will be for the Transportation Research Board to develop and release a request for proposals from potential venues. There are several hotels in the area which may be interested in hosting the conference. We won't have a final date and venue to report until all responses to the RFP are in, evaluated and a contract signed.
Here is some information on the area from the Houston Downtown Management District:
“Downtown Houston is booming thanks to an unprecedented amount of public and private investment-- developers have spent more than $4 billion in the last decade to transform downtown into a vital city center.
Downtown Houston is home to dramatic 20th Century skyscrapers housing the offices where many of downtown’s 140,000 workers are employed, a world-class Theater District, a growing residential population, a popular nightlife scene centered in the Historic District, new light rail, an enhanced convention center and numerous new hotels. It also boasts two state-of-the-art sports facilities that attract millions throughout the year.
The Houston Downtown Management District has facilitated many of the public and private projects that have transformed downtown over the last decade. The District began its revitalization efforts in 1995. To accelerate the renewal of the city's urban core, the District set several important goals with quality of life as the underlying theme: building a lasting constituency for downtown; recruiting investors, retailers and tenants while retaining those already downtown; and making downtown clean, safe and attractive.”
Downtown Houston will no doubt be an excellent location for next year’s conference. Please monitor this Blog closely for additional information. We’ll post it as quickly as it becomes available. In the mean time, you can learn more about Downtown Houston by visiting the area’s website (please note that the Coast Guard does not endorse this website nor any specific business highlighted): http://www.downtownhouston.org/
We look forward to seeing you in Downtown Houston next spring.
Here is some information on the area from the Houston Downtown Management District:
“Downtown Houston is booming thanks to an unprecedented amount of public and private investment-- developers have spent more than $4 billion in the last decade to transform downtown into a vital city center.
Downtown Houston is home to dramatic 20th Century skyscrapers housing the offices where many of downtown’s 140,000 workers are employed, a world-class Theater District, a growing residential population, a popular nightlife scene centered in the Historic District, new light rail, an enhanced convention center and numerous new hotels. It also boasts two state-of-the-art sports facilities that attract millions throughout the year.
The Houston Downtown Management District has facilitated many of the public and private projects that have transformed downtown over the last decade. The District began its revitalization efforts in 1995. To accelerate the renewal of the city's urban core, the District set several important goals with quality of life as the underlying theme: building a lasting constituency for downtown; recruiting investors, retailers and tenants while retaining those already downtown; and making downtown clean, safe and attractive.”
Downtown Houston will no doubt be an excellent location for next year’s conference. Please monitor this Blog closely for additional information. We’ll post it as quickly as it becomes available. In the mean time, you can learn more about Downtown Houston by visiting the area’s website (please note that the Coast Guard does not endorse this website nor any specific business highlighted): http://www.downtownhouston.org/
We look forward to seeing you in Downtown Houston next spring.
Monday, July 12, 2010
NY & NJ HARBOR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY COMMITTEE: TOOL OF THE GOVERNMENT
by
Anonymous
Guest post by Mr. John F. Tavolaro, the Deputy Chief of the Operations Division at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New York District.
NY - NJ HARBOR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY COMMITTEE: TOOL OF THE GOVERNMENT
Now that I have your attention, let me describe how my agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District, leverages the NY and NJ Harbor Operations and Safety Committee (Harbor Ops) in our Regulatory Permit Program. First some background on both.
In the Port of NY and NJ we have a very active and vibrant Harbor Ops Committee, which is a direct reflection of the active and vibrant Harbor community. Harbor Ops casts a wide net and is inclusive of anyone who cares to participate and express an opinion. It has a Steering Committee, made up of some of the key Port players such as the US Coast Guard, Harbor Pilot organizations, NOAA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others. This group vets subjects of interest and creates the agenda for the second group the Harbor Operations Full Committee, which is made up of the broader public, such as terminal operators, tug companies and others. The Full Committee is briefed on harbor issues related to safety and operations and provides feedback.
One of the many programs that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers manages is the Regulatory Program. Anyone who proposes to perform dredging, construction, filling or dumping of dredged material in waters of the U.S. or ocean waters needs to obtain a permit from the Corps, pursuant to several federal laws. Part of this permit process is a public interest review, involving soliciting public comments by way of public notices and/or public meetings or hearings. In a highly populated and busy Port such as ours, there are many competing interests that all want access to the water – commercial, recreational, residential and industrial. Sometimes proposals are made that might create unsafe conditions if they were built as planned because of a lack of understanding on how competing interests already use the waterway. We have found that before a permit proposal goes out for public comment it is very useful to vet it with the Harbor Ops committees to obtain insight on the navigational safety of the proposal and how it might be modified or amended in order to be made safer.
Here’s how it works. An applicant comes in to us with a proposal, usually as a pre-application submittal (most permit applicants know it is better to come talk to us before submitting a formal application so that the time clock for a decision isn’t running - it makes it easier to engage in a constructive dialogue and change the proposal if necessary). We will review it and give them comments, including the comment that they must obtain comments and suggestions on the proposal from Harbor Ops, if we believe the proposal will be something that Harbor Ops is interested in. The applicant will then set up time on the agenda for the Steering Committee and brief them. The Steering Committee will provide constructive comments directly to the applicant, and if appropriate, put the proposal on the agenda for the Full Committee for comment. Usually, the applicant will modify their proposal to account for the comments received from the Harbor Ops committees before submitting their formal application. The beauty of this is that one important part of our public interest review for the permit application, navigational safety and minimizing interference with other legitimate uses of the waters, is pretty much taken care of before we even get the formal application. Working through the Harbor Ops structure is a quicker and fairly painless way of obtaining these comments. If we were to issue a public notice and receive individual comments from many of these same players, it would be far more time consuming, frustrating and tedious for all involved. I think leveraging the Harbor Ops committees in this manner better serves the public and directly engages all the necessary players in an efficient and transparent manner – it’s good government.
John F. Tavolaro
Deputy Chief, Operations Division
US Army Corps of Engineers New York District
NY - NJ HARBOR OPERATIONS AND SAFETY COMMITTEE: TOOL OF THE GOVERNMENT
Now that I have your attention, let me describe how my agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District, leverages the NY and NJ Harbor Operations and Safety Committee (Harbor Ops) in our Regulatory Permit Program. First some background on both.
In the Port of NY and NJ we have a very active and vibrant Harbor Ops Committee, which is a direct reflection of the active and vibrant Harbor community. Harbor Ops casts a wide net and is inclusive of anyone who cares to participate and express an opinion. It has a Steering Committee, made up of some of the key Port players such as the US Coast Guard, Harbor Pilot organizations, NOAA, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others. This group vets subjects of interest and creates the agenda for the second group the Harbor Operations Full Committee, which is made up of the broader public, such as terminal operators, tug companies and others. The Full Committee is briefed on harbor issues related to safety and operations and provides feedback.
One of the many programs that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers manages is the Regulatory Program. Anyone who proposes to perform dredging, construction, filling or dumping of dredged material in waters of the U.S. or ocean waters needs to obtain a permit from the Corps, pursuant to several federal laws. Part of this permit process is a public interest review, involving soliciting public comments by way of public notices and/or public meetings or hearings. In a highly populated and busy Port such as ours, there are many competing interests that all want access to the water – commercial, recreational, residential and industrial. Sometimes proposals are made that might create unsafe conditions if they were built as planned because of a lack of understanding on how competing interests already use the waterway. We have found that before a permit proposal goes out for public comment it is very useful to vet it with the Harbor Ops committees to obtain insight on the navigational safety of the proposal and how it might be modified or amended in order to be made safer.
Here’s how it works. An applicant comes in to us with a proposal, usually as a pre-application submittal (most permit applicants know it is better to come talk to us before submitting a formal application so that the time clock for a decision isn’t running - it makes it easier to engage in a constructive dialogue and change the proposal if necessary). We will review it and give them comments, including the comment that they must obtain comments and suggestions on the proposal from Harbor Ops, if we believe the proposal will be something that Harbor Ops is interested in. The applicant will then set up time on the agenda for the Steering Committee and brief them. The Steering Committee will provide constructive comments directly to the applicant, and if appropriate, put the proposal on the agenda for the Full Committee for comment. Usually, the applicant will modify their proposal to account for the comments received from the Harbor Ops committees before submitting their formal application. The beauty of this is that one important part of our public interest review for the permit application, navigational safety and minimizing interference with other legitimate uses of the waters, is pretty much taken care of before we even get the formal application. Working through the Harbor Ops structure is a quicker and fairly painless way of obtaining these comments. If we were to issue a public notice and receive individual comments from many of these same players, it would be far more time consuming, frustrating and tedious for all involved. I think leveraging the Harbor Ops committees in this manner better serves the public and directly engages all the necessary players in an efficient and transparent manner – it’s good government.
John F. Tavolaro
Deputy Chief, Operations Division
US Army Corps of Engineers New York District
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Houston in 2011?
by
Anonymous
Members of the Southeast Texas Waterway Advisory Committee (SETWAC) and Houston-Galvaston Navigation Safety Advisory Committee's (HOGANSAC) bid to host the 2011 National HSC/AMSC conference was resoundingly supported during the HSC Chair's meeting during the 2010 conference in Jersey City. We applaud SETWAC and HOGANSAC for stepping up to this challenge!
There is a lot of work ahead for both committees to make next year's conference a success, and there is not much time to get it done. They are actively seeking volunteers to be part of the Planning and Hosting Committee. The initial planning meeting will be in Houston on Wednesday, June 30th.
At the meeting they will discuss the location, venue for the evening event, sponsors and exhibitors. What we know so far is that the conference will be held somewhere in the Houston area. The date may be moved up a bit, instead of the usual dates in May or June. Because date selection is always a challenge, nothing is finalized yet and the planning committee will have to work closely with Coast Guard Headquarters to ensure a suitable date is picked.
It will take several sponsors, exhibitors, and volunteers to make this conference a great success. We hope that you will be able to attend and participate in making 2011 the best Harbor Safety Conference yet. If you would like to participate in the planning process please send an email to LCDR Ellis Moose at ellis.h.moose@uscg.mil. We can refer you to the proper contacts in Texas. You can also monitor this blog where we'll keep you up to date on the status of the conference. Once planning conference calls start, we'll keep you informed of the dates and times of those as well.
There is a lot of work ahead for both committees to make next year's conference a success, and there is not much time to get it done. They are actively seeking volunteers to be part of the Planning and Hosting Committee. The initial planning meeting will be in Houston on Wednesday, June 30th.
At the meeting they will discuss the location, venue for the evening event, sponsors and exhibitors. What we know so far is that the conference will be held somewhere in the Houston area. The date may be moved up a bit, instead of the usual dates in May or June. Because date selection is always a challenge, nothing is finalized yet and the planning committee will have to work closely with Coast Guard Headquarters to ensure a suitable date is picked.
It will take several sponsors, exhibitors, and volunteers to make this conference a great success. We hope that you will be able to attend and participate in making 2011 the best Harbor Safety Conference yet. If you would like to participate in the planning process please send an email to LCDR Ellis Moose at ellis.h.moose@uscg.mil. We can refer you to the proper contacts in Texas. You can also monitor this blog where we'll keep you up to date on the status of the conference. Once planning conference calls start, we'll keep you informed of the dates and times of those as well.
Take the Conference Survey
by
Anonymous
The 2010 Conference Evaluation Survey is now available. Comments, feedback, and suggestions from 2010 Conference attendees regarding the content, quality, and structure of the program are encouraged and will help ensure that future programs meet the expectations of participants. Please respond as soon as possible to the 15 evaluation questions (Questions 1-9 are on the first page and Questions 10-15 are on the second page). You must respond to Questions 1-3 before proceeding to page 2 and finally submitting your responses.
Link to the 2010 Conference Evaluation Survey
Your responses really do help us keep fine tuning these events so please take the time to fill out the survey.
Link to the 2010 Conference Evaluation Survey
Your responses really do help us keep fine tuning these events so please take the time to fill out the survey.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Watch the HSC/AMSC Conference Videos
by
Anonymous
The Transportation Research Board arranged for each session of this year's National Harbor Safety/Area Maritime Security Conference to be professionally recorded. Those e-sessions are now available for viewing. The below link will take you to website where you can find the e-sessions:
http://www.bethereglobal.com/content/449_trb_harbor_safety/
Please note, this link takes you to a non-Coast Guard website. The Coast Guard does not necessarily agree with or endorse any of the comments made at the conference.
In order to view the e-sessions, simply scroll through the agenda and click on the presentation you'd like to see. You will be taken to a video presentation. We hope you enjoy the opportunity to review the conference or, if you couldn't attend this year, here is your chance to see what you missed.
We'd like to send out a huge Thank You to the TRB staff that supported this year's conference.
http://www.bethereglobal.com/content/449_trb_harbor_safety/
Please note, this link takes you to a non-Coast Guard website. The Coast Guard does not necessarily agree with or endorse any of the comments made at the conference.
In order to view the e-sessions, simply scroll through the agenda and click on the presentation you'd like to see. You will be taken to a video presentation. We hope you enjoy the opportunity to review the conference or, if you couldn't attend this year, here is your chance to see what you missed.
We'd like to send out a huge Thank You to the TRB staff that supported this year's conference.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Thank you for Attending the National HSC/AMSC Conference!
by
Anonymous
Last week we all enjoyed the hospitality of the New York/New Jersey Harbor Ops and AMSC at the National HSC/AMSC Conference. For those of you who attended, we will be sending out a survey shortly to see how we did. This was our first attempt at combining safety and security into one conference and general feedback has been initially positive. We understand we still have some kinks to work out, and we'd love to hear your thoughts. We look forward to hearing from you!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
WELCOME!
Welcome to the U.S. Coast Guard's National Harbor Safety Committee Blog, the official blog for all things related to Harbor Safety Committees around the country. Please visit the U.S. Coast Guard homepage at www.uscg.mil for official information from the service in general. Any links provided to a U.S. Coast Guard presence on other third party sites are for your reference only. The U.S. Coast Guard does not endorse any non-government websites, companies, or applications.
Harbor Safety Committees
- Commonwealth Port Authority (Siapan)
- Greater Ketchikan Area LEPC
- Greater New Orleans Barge Fleeting Association
- Guam Chamber of Commerce
- Hawaii Ocean Safety Team (HOST)
- Jacksonville Marine Transportation Exchange
- Lower Columbia Region HSC
- Marine Exchange of Puget Sound
- Marine Exchange of Southern California
- Mariners Advisory Committee for the Bay & River Delaware (MAC)
- Maritime Navigation and Safety Association
- Miami River Marine Group
- Port of Morgan City
- Puget Sound HSC
- Savannah Maritime Association
- Southeast Texas Waterways Advisory Council
- Tennessee River Valley Association
- The Harbor Safety Committee of the San Francisco Bay Region
- The Maine and New Hampshire Port Safety Forum
- Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments
- Waterways Association of Pittsburgh
Coast Guard & DHS Blogs
Topics
- 2010 Conference (4)
- 2011 Conference (3)
- 2012 Conference (2)
- CMTS (1)
- HSC Links (2)
- video (1)
Blog Archive
National Harbor Safety Committee Blog Submissions & Authorship Policy
Note: All references to “blog” are to the National Harbor Safety Committee Blog (http://www. Harborsafetycommittee.blogspot.com).
All blog entries should conform to the blog’s purpose as “the official dialog on harbor safety committee issues nationwide” or to illustrate “best practices to improve the safety and efficiency of America’s Marine Transportation System.” Entries should include external links to references to build credibility and clarify information/facts. Entries shall also follow the guidelines set forth in the blog’s comment policy. SENSITIVE AND/OR SECURITY INFORMATION MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED OR DISCUSSED ON THE BLOG.
Blog administrators reserve the right to review post ideas/submissions to determine whether or not they will appear in the blog. Administrators may also edit submissions (not comments) for grammar and SAPP (security, accuracy, policy and propriety) prior to posting. The Coast Guard provides no compensation for submissions published on the blog.
Unless annotated, the person posting the entry is the author. If an entry was authored by someone other than the person posting it, the author’s name(s) will appear at the beginning of the post (“Post written by”). Blog administrators may occasionally exercise editorial control over the content, but everyone listed as an author has made a substantial, direct, intellectual contribution to the work and has approved the final version. If a person(s) contributed to an entry through research, data collection, creative idea, and the like, the contributor’s name(s) will appear at the beginning of the post (“ contributed to this post”).
All opinions expressed in blog postings are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Coast Guard. Blog authors are solely responsible for the material they submit for posting.
Terms:
Administrator – Any person responsible for assisting with the management of the blog and blog content
Author – a person who writes blog submissions
CG-5521 – Coast Guard Ocean and Transportation Division; the people who manage this blog
Contributor – A person who assists with gathering content for a blog entry
All blog entries should conform to the blog’s purpose as “the official dialog on harbor safety committee issues nationwide” or to illustrate “best practices to improve the safety and efficiency of America’s Marine Transportation System.” Entries should include external links to references to build credibility and clarify information/facts. Entries shall also follow the guidelines set forth in the blog’s comment policy. SENSITIVE AND/OR SECURITY INFORMATION MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED OR DISCUSSED ON THE BLOG.
Blog administrators reserve the right to review post ideas/submissions to determine whether or not they will appear in the blog. Administrators may also edit submissions (not comments) for grammar and SAPP (security, accuracy, policy and propriety) prior to posting. The Coast Guard provides no compensation for submissions published on the blog.
Unless annotated, the person posting the entry is the author. If an entry was authored by someone other than the person posting it, the author’s name(s) will appear at the beginning of the post (“Post written by
All opinions expressed in blog postings are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Coast Guard. Blog authors are solely responsible for the material they submit for posting.
Terms:
Administrator – Any person responsible for assisting with the management of the blog and blog content
Author – a person who writes blog submissions
CG-5521 – Coast Guard Ocean and Transportation Division; the people who manage this blog
Contributor – A person who assists with gathering content for a blog entry
Coast Guard Comment Policy
We welcome your comments on postings at all Coast Guard sites/journals. These are sponsored by the U.S. Coast Guard to provide a forum to talk about our work providing maritime safety, security and stewardship for the American people to secure the homeland, save lives and property, protect the environment, and promote economic prosperity. The information provided is for public information only and is not a distress communication channel. People in an emergency and need of Coast Guard assistance should use VHF-FM Channel 16 (156.8 MHz), dial 911, or call their nearest Coast Guard unit.
Please note: Anonymous comments have been disabled for this journal. It is preferred that you use your real name when posting a comment. WE WILL POST THE NAME YOU ENTER WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT. Also, you are welcome to use Open ID or other user technologies that may be available.
All comments submitted are moderated and will be reviewed before posting. The Coast Guard retains the discretion to determine which comments it will post and which it will not. We expect all contributors to be respectful. We will not post comments that contain personal attacks of any kind; refer to Coast Guard or other employees by name; contain offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups, or contain vulgar language. We will also not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic or that promote services or products.
We will make our best effort to promptly post those comments that are consistent with the Comment Policy, but given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will usually occur only during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. Comments submitted outside of business hours will be read and posted as quickly as possible.
Please note: Anonymous comments have been disabled for this journal. It is preferred that you use your real name when posting a comment. WE WILL POST THE NAME YOU ENTER WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT. Also, you are welcome to use Open ID or other user technologies that may be available.
All comments submitted are moderated and will be reviewed before posting. The Coast Guard retains the discretion to determine which comments it will post and which it will not. We expect all contributors to be respectful. We will not post comments that contain personal attacks of any kind; refer to Coast Guard or other employees by name; contain offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups, or contain vulgar language. We will also not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic or that promote services or products.
We will make our best effort to promptly post those comments that are consistent with the Comment Policy, but given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will usually occur only during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. Comments submitted outside of business hours will be read and posted as quickly as possible.
Total Pageviews
This is an official United States Coast Guard posting for the Public's information.
Our posting does not endorse this site or anything on it, including links to other sites,
and we disclaim responsibility and liability for the site and its content.

